Thursday, October 8, 2020 · 6:00 PM
Agenda
Not on file
What was on the agenda.
Packet
Not on file
The supporting materials the board reviewed.
One-line summary
At a 6:00 p.m. special meeting, the Council approved the agenda, approved CARES Act and HRA/EDA funding for an Arvig broadband project, and adjourned at 6:39 p.m.
3 items as recorded in the minutes, each with a short summary of what was at issue.
1Approve agenda
Approve the meeting agenda.
The Council approved the agenda for the special meeting before taking up CARES Act funding.
2CARES Act funding
Discussion of CARES Act funding, including broadband service expansion with Arvig, possible fire department needs, and use of HRA/EDA funds for the city's share of broadband costs.
The Council discussed using CARES Act money and HRA/EDA funds to support an Arvig broadband project in a western quadrant of the city and Wild Run East. The minutes describe $140,000 in CARES money and $200,000 in HRA/EDA funds for the project, with a resident setup fee of $250 and monthly cost of $83 mentioned during questions. The Council approved the funding motion, with all present recorded in favor.
The Council also discussed possible CARES Act uses for fire department expansion, more firefighters, and provisions for them, with options for a fire station expected the following week. No separate fire department spending motion was recorded in these minutes.
Council approved CARES Act funding for the Arvig broadband project and authorization to pursue HRA/EDA funds; fire department uses were discussed but no separate motion was recorded.
3Adjournment
Adjourn the special meeting.
The Council adjourned the special meeting at 6:39 p.m.
3 motions on the record.
M1Motion by breyen, second by blake to approve agenda.
Motion by breyen, second by blake to approve agenda
moved by breyen, seconded by blake
Motion carried
M2Motion to approve 140,000 cares act funs... partnering with arvig and... If that is the case 200,000 of those funds would be authorized for this project.
Motion to approve 140,000 cares act funs ... partnering with arvig and . . . If that is the case 200,000 of those funds would be authorized for this project.
seconded by rainville
M3Motion to adjourn by breyen.
Motion to adjourn by breyen
moved by breyen, seconded by Rainville
Amounts named in or tied to a motion that passed, each shown with the motion. A motion can approve an amount, cap it, or remove it from a list, so read the motion text. These links are AI-extracted, and the minutes control.
CARES Act money authorized for the broadband project with Arvig.
$140,000
HRA/EDA funds discussed and authorized for the city's 40% share of the Arvig broadband project cost.
$200,000
When someone referred back to earlier business, we found the matching prior discussion and tied it in here.
Breyen and pilon have been looking at internet service for 6 years meeting with the county
What this is about
Prior efforts by Breyen and Pilon to improve internet service and work with the county.
The records I searched do not contain a prior decision or discussion matching the recollection that Breyen and Pilon had been working for six years with the county on internet service improvements. The only related references found were general mentions of Jeff Pilon’s prior city service: at the March 24, 2026 Planning Commission meeting, commissioners noted Pilon had 16 years of city council experience, including 10 years as mayor, when recommending him for a Planning Commission vacancy. The search results also show Council Member Breyen acting on unrelated council business, but they do not document broadband/internet meetings with the county, a formal council direction, vote, or funding action on that topic.
In September the county said they should look elsewhere.
What this is about
A prior September statement from the county that the city should look elsewhere for broadband help.
The records I searched do not contain a prior September county statement matching this recollection that the city should “look elsewhere” for broadband help. The search results that mention September or the county are unrelated items, such as turf treatment schedules, subdivision materials, and property/legal descriptions involving Anoka County roads or land records. No formal council discussion or vote about county broadband assistance was found in these results.
The last week 1/2 they've had meetings with providers. Asked people that turned us down are now paying attention.
What this is about
Prior contacts with providers and recent change in provider interest in the broadband project.
The records I searched do not contain a prior decision or discussion matching this recollection about broadband provider contacts or providers changing their level of interest. The search results provided are about unrelated items such as subdivision conditions, cannabis interim use permit conditions, Planning and Zoning interviews, employment testing, and a BCA access agreement. Based on these results, there is no record here of which providers were contacted, which providers previously declined, or any formal council action related to renewed provider interest in the broadband project.
DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the Minor Subdivision subject to the following conditions: 1\.
emphasizing the need to understand each situation thoroughly. Martell affirmed his belief in preserving wetlands and wooded areas and supporting the farmer's right to operate when addressing conf
#### General Employees Plan Benefits General Employees Plan requires three years of service to vest. Benefits are based on a member's highest average salary for any 5 successive years of allowable ser
MOTION BY CHAIRMAN HAAPALA, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LEWIS, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT AS WRITTEN. SIX (6) AYES. MOTION CARRIED. ### CANDIDATE SELECTION RECOMMENDATION The commission discus
MOTION BY CHAIRMAN HAAPALA, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LEWIS, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT AS WRITTEN. SIX (6) AYES. MOTION CARRIED. ## CANDIDATE SELECTION RECOMMENDATION The commission discuss
Documents and recordings archived for this meeting, when available.
The summary on this page is AI-extracted and may need correction. The PDFs and the meeting recording are the official record. What do the trust labels mean?