M1_approve_agendaMOTION BY CM BREYEN, 2ND BY CM RAINVILLE TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
moved by BREYEN, seconded by RAINVILLE
- YPilon
- YRainville
- YBreyen
- YAlders
- ·Fladebo
Monday, September 16, 2024 · 6:00 PM
One-line summary
The Council held a 2025 preliminary budget work session, approved the agenda, discussed levy, fund balance, MS4, code compliance, sheriff contract, and Fire Department budget changes, and continued the budget discussion to September 23.
3 items as recorded in the agenda, packet, and minutes, each with a plain-English summary of what was at issue.
A1Call to Order; Pledge of Allegiance; Roll Call; Approve Agenda
Call to Order; Pledge of Allegiance; Roll Call; Approve Agenda
Mayor Pilon opened the 4th Budget Work Session at 6:00 p.m.; roll call showed Pilon, Rainville, Breyen, and Alders present and Fladebo absent, and the Council approved the agenda as presented.
The agenda was approved as presented, 4 ayes.
A2Continue Discussion on the 2025 Preliminary Budget
Continue discussion on the 2025 preliminary budget.
The Council continued reviewing the 2025 preliminary budget, including the packet's proposed 9.98% levy increase of $193,190, with $20,000 of that increase for debt service, and a General Fund budget showing $2,487,865 in both revenues and expenditures/uses. No preliminary levy was adopted at this meeting; another work session was set for 9/23/24.
The Council discussed higher Arvig internet costs and possible ways to reduce service charges by checking existing lines or alternatives. It also discussed MS4 engineering costs that were higher than expected, including a possible $24,500 annual cost and use of additional fund balance for the increase.
The Council discussed adding a $15,000 code compliance budget as a limit for complaint-driven enforcement work, with the understanding that work would need a proceed and City Council approval and would stop if the limit was reached.
The Council discussed the Fire Department budget, including removing $3,500 in fire chief merit wages, discussing an $80,000 fire chief salary figure, placing $20,000 in other pay for education incentives, and reducing fire supplies to $10,000. The discussion showed the Council still needed to clarify whether education incentives could be reimbursed or needed to be budgeted directly.
The Council discussed the Sheriff's Contract, shown in the packet at $490,795 for 2025 with a $25,250 increase over the 2024 budget. Members discussed the two-year increase, staffing and recruitment pressures in law enforcement, and why contracting remained less expensive than starting a city police department.
The Council discussed whether to increase ball field rental expectations and whether year-end funds could be designated by resolution for ball field improvements such as chalk, lime, and rakes. The minutes list an action item to create a resolution for putting funds into a ball field improvement fund at the end of the year.
The Council discussed the preliminary budget and scheduled another meeting for 9/23/24 because more discussion was needed.
A3Adjourn
Adjourn.
Council Member Rainville moved and Alders seconded adjournment; the minutes state the meeting adjourned at 9:34 p.m.
The minutes record a motion to adjourn and state that the meeting adjourned at 9:34 p.m.; no vote tally was shown.
2 motions on the record. Split votes are highlighted.
M1_approve_agendaMOTION BY CM BREYEN, 2ND BY CM RAINVILLE TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
moved by BREYEN, seconded by RAINVILLE
M2_adjournMOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER RAINVILLE, SECONDED BY ALDERS TO ADJOURN.
moved by RAINVILLE, seconded by ALDERS
When someone referred back to earlier business, we found the matching prior discussion and tied it in here.
The council and staff met on August 26, 2024, to continue discussing the proposed 2025 Budget. Below are the changes implemented because of that budget meeting:
— Lori Yager
What this is about
Prior August 26, 2024 budget work session and changes carried forward into this meeting.
The records I searched do not contain the August 26, 2024 budget work session itself or a record of the specific “changes implemented” from that meeting. The closest related records are later references to the 2025 budget: an April 14, 2026 packet states that Resolution No. 2024-105 appropriated funds for the 2025 budget, but the search results do not show the meeting where that resolution was adopted or the vote outcome. Later records show the 2025 budget was revisited after adoption. At the January 13, 2026 meeting packet, staff proposed amending the 2025 budget because legal, park maintenance, accounting, elections, and Sheriff expenditures were higher than expected, offset by administration savings from a reorganization. At the April 14, 2026 meeting packet, staff proposed another 2025 budget amendment transferring $15,000 from Administration and $10,000 from Contingency to Fire training, for a total $25,000 adjustment, related to recording State firefighter pension revenue and expense. These later records are related to the 2025 budget, but they do not document the August 26, 2024 work session changes.
This is the price the city pays for choosing to not increase the levy for the 2024 budget. The city had a 5.3% levy increase in 2024 with an 11.2% increase in expenses.
What this is about
A reminder that the 2024 levy decision contributed to 2025 budget pressure.
The records provided here do not include the meeting where the 2024 levy or 2024 budget was adopted, nor do they show a formal vote “choosing to not increase the levy” for the 2024 budget. From these search results, I cannot confirm the specific recollection that the 2024 levy increase was 5.3% while expenses increased 11.2%. The records do show later budget pressure and related adjustments. At the April 14, 2026 meeting, the packet included a proposed resolution amending the 2025 budget by moving $15,000 from Administration and $10,000 from Contingency to the Fire Department, for a total $25,000 adjustment, because year-end recording of State firefighter pension revenue and expense caused the Fire Department to exceed its original 2025 budget. The May 12, 2026 audit materials also state that 2025 General Fund revenue increased only 0.8% from 2024, while taxes and special assessments increased by $174,734 due to new assessments and an increased levy.
but I remember we had that question before was the numbers are a little off one number included the increas Deb this now all numbers we've been seeing since last
What this is about
Council recalled an earlier question about whether levy numbers included the debt increase.
The records show a related levy/debt reference in the May 12, 2026 meeting packet: the City’s 2026 tax levy was listed as $2,332,787, a 9.55% increase, and the packet says that increase was “primarily for debt service.” The same packet also notes the City remained under its statutory debt limit as of December 31, 2025. I did not find a prior recorded council discussion or formal vote in these search results specifically asking whether the levy numbers did or did not include the debt increase. So this appears to be a partial match: the packet confirms the levy figures being reviewed included a debt-service-related increase, but the searched records do not show the earlier question itself.
yeah I just you know again we're pretty late in the budget cycle but it it' be nice to know because we talked about this last time the pass through being a net zero right
— Mayor Pilon
What this is about
Council recalled prior discussion about planning-fee pass-through accounting and escrow accounts.
The records show a partial match. In the March 10, 2026 packet, the proposed Planning, Zoning, & Development fee schedule described land-use application fees and non-interest-bearing escrow deposits, including a standard $1,500 escrow for certain applications. The language says escrow may be used for direct City costs such as recording fees and third-party consultants, including attorney, engineer, planner, septic, or others; if costs exceed the escrow, the applicant remains responsible, and if funds remain after review is complete, the City refunds the unused balance within 60 days. Related escrow language also appears in developer agreements in the March 10, 2026 and April 14, 2026 packets, including a $5,000 cash escrow that the City could draw on to reimburse costs and refund any overage. However, the records provided here do not show a recorded Council vote or a specific prior decision stating that planning-fee pass-throughs would be “net zero”; they show the accounting mechanism that would make applicants responsible for actual costs rather than the City absorbing them.
mayor can't we take the fulltime earnings down we Ved last week that we are not going to seal the fulltime Chie we're going to go with a parttime Chie
— Council Member Alders
What this is about
Council recalled a prior Council vote to pursue a part-time rather than full-time fire chief.
The records searched do not contain a prior Council decision matching the recollection that Council voted “last week” to pursue a part-time rather than full-time Fire Chief. There is only a partial related reference: the January 13, 2026 packet’s clerk update lists “Extended the Fire Chief contract” among tasks completed by staff and Council in 2025, but the search results provided do not include the meeting minutes, motion, vote outcome, or any language distinguishing a part-time versus full-time Fire Chief position.
and for what it's worth we did thoroughly investigate that we looked at contract in the neighboring cities looked at pH own
— Mayor Pilon
What this is about
Council recalled prior investigation of starting a city police department versus contracting for law enforcement.
The records searched show a related discussion at the April 14, 2026 meeting, when Anoka County Sheriff’s Office representatives presented the monthly sheriff’s report and Chief Deputy Bill Jacobson thanked the council for its long-standing partnership with Nowthen. He said the arrangement provides high-quality law enforcement while saving taxpayer money, and deputies discussed their experience with the sheriff’s office and local police departments. However, these results do not contain the earlier investigation Mayor Pilon recalled into creating a city police department versus contracting with neighboring cities or the county. No formal vote or decision on that specific comparison appears in the records provided here.
This page was left intentionally blank. <figure> CITY OF NOWTHEN </figure> ### REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <table> <tr> <th>Agenda Item:</t
### TITLE OF ISSUE: Approval of Resolution 2026-XX Amending 2025 Budget BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The City of Nowthen is a Plan A statutory city. Under Minnesota Statute, Plan A cities
<table> <tr> <th>Description</th> <th>Fee</th> </tr> <tr> <td>SSTS Reinspection</td> <td>$95.00 per hour, 1 hour minimum</td> </tr> </table> ## Planning, Zoning, & Development Fees <table>
### TITLE OF ISSUE: Resolution Amending 2025 Budget BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The City of Nowthen is a Plan A statutory city. Under Minnesota Statute, Plan A cities are required to adop
### General Fund Budgetary Highlights Actual revenues were $31,569 under budget and expenditures were $103,155 under budget; along with transfers, other financing sources and prior period adjustments,
Documents and recordings archived for this meeting, when available.
Meeting City Council Work Session — Agenda Packet (2024-09-16)
Packet · Monday, September 16, 2024
28 pages
Meeting City Council Work Session — Agenda (2024-09-16)
Agenda · Monday, September 16, 2024
1 pages
Meeting City Council Work Session — Minutes (2024-09-16)
Minutes · Monday, September 16, 2024
4 pages
Meeting recording
YouTube
Transcript · 1344 segments · 3:32:19
The structured brief on this page is auto-generated and may need correction. The PDFs and the meeting recording remain the official record. What do the trust labels mean?