$242.8M
The restitution a court ordered Aimee Bock to pay. Ordered amounts are rarely collected in full.
Who reported it, and what it covers
reported June 5, 2026
Ordered at the May 21, 2026 sentencing; judgment signed June 4, 2026
One defendant (Aimee Bock)
Restitution a court ordered a defendant to pay. Ordered amounts are rarely collected in full.
What it does not show
Not money collected. It is what the court ordered her to repay, and ordered restitution is rarely paid in full.
What the source says
$700 total special assessment; $242,807,755.00 total restitution. Signed by Judge Nancy E. Brasel on 6/4/2026.
Sentencing judgment as to Aimee Marie Bock (Doc. 907), United States v. Bock, 0:22-cr-00223, U.S. District Court, Minnesota, June 5, 2026. Court record (primary source).
Checked against the source October 11, 2026.
Other numbers in circulation
Each of these measures something different. They are not steps toward one total and are never added together.
Cite this figure
Everything needed to cite this number and check it against the original.
$242.8M: Restitution ordered against Aimee Bock
Restitution ordered
One defendant (Aimee Bock). Ordered at the May 21, 2026 sentencing; judgment signed June 4, 2026.
Sentencing judgment as to Aimee Marie Bock (Doc. 907), United States v. Bock, 0:22-cr-00223 (U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota). Court record; primary source.
June 5, 2026
October 11, 2026
$242.8M: Restitution ordered against Aimee Bock. Type: Restitution ordered. Covers: Ordered at the May 21, 2026 sentencing; judgment signed June 4, 2026. Source (primary): U.S. District Court, Minnesota, “Sentencing judgment as to Aimee Marie Bock (Doc. 907), United States v. Bock, 0:22-cr-00223,” June 5, 2026, https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65360839/907/united-states-v-bock/ Via MN Public Tools, mnpublictools.com/fraud/figure/bock-restitution-240m (checked October 11, 2026).
Every figure in one file: spreadsheet (CSV) · JSON.
Changes to this record
Aimee Bock’s restitution now cites the court judgment of $242,807,755
Figures now keep their source’s qualifier, and claims name the speaker’s title on the date
People charged but not convicted are presumed innocent, and amounts labeled alleged come from charging documents, not proven losses. Method and corrections